Entering Paradise “for” your deeds

The Prophet ﷺ said: “‘None of you will enter Paradise for his deeds.’ They asked: ‘Not even you O Allaah’s Messenger ﷺ?’ He replied: ‘Not even me, unless Allaah covers me with His Favor and Mercy.’[1]

Shaikh al-Albaani:

“Know that this narration may be problematic to some people and they may presume that it contradicts Allaah’s تعالى statement: {This is the Paradise which you have been made to inherit for what you used to do}[2] and similar verses and narrations which point out that entering Paradise happens for one’s deeds. This has been addressed in several ways, the most correct answer being that: the preposition “for” in the narration means “for the price of,” and the “for” in the verse means “because of.” In other words, righteous deeds are a necessary means to entering Paradise, however they don’t amount to the price for entering Paradise and its everlasting bliss and ranks.”

[1] Saheeh Muslim 2816
[2] Surah Az-Zukhruf 43:72

[as-sisilah as-saheehah 2602 / alalbaany.com]

Entering Paradise “for” your deeds

The Kursi is Allaah’s Footstool

Imaam at-Tahaawiyy said:

The `Arsh (Throne) and the Kursi (Footstool) are real.”

Shaikh al-Albaani:

“Allaah تعالى said about the Kursi: {His Kursi extends over the heavens and the earth}.[1] The Kursi is that which is in front of the `Arsh; and it has been authentically reported that Ibn `Abbaas said: ‘The Kursi is the place for the two Feet, and no one can tell how vast the `Arsh is except Allaah تعالى,’ as narrated in my book Mukhtasar Al-`Uluw lith-Thahabi no. 36.[2]

There isn’t any authentic report ascribable to the Prophet ﷺ regarding the Kursi besides his ﷺ statement: ‘The seven heavens in comparison to the Kursi are just like a ring thrown in a desert, and the greatness of the `Arsh over the Kursi is like the greatness of that desert over that ring.’ This is something which also invalidates interpreting the Kursi as ‘knowledge,’ and this interpretation is not an authentic report from Ibn `Abbaas as I clarified in As-Saheehah no. 109.”

[1] Surah Al-Baqarah 2:255
[2] Abu Musa al-Ash`ari also said: “The Kursi is the place for the two Feet, and it creaks like a camel saddle does under heavy load” –Mukhtasar Al-`Uluw lith-Thahabi no. 85

[al-`aqeedah at-tahaawiyyah sharh wa ta`leeq 49 / alalbaany.com]

The Kursi is Allaah’s Footstool

Every mushrik is a kaafir and every kaafir is a mushrik

Q: “Is every mushrik (one who associates partners with Allaah in that which is only for Him) a kaafir (disbeliever), but not every kaafir a mushrik?”

Shaikh al-Albaani:

“This is the understanding present in people’s minds save a few. I will explain that with an example: a man testifies that none has the right to be worshiped except Allaah and that Muhammad ﷺ is the Messenger of Allaah, and he prays, fasts, etc., but he denies a verse from the Qur.aan. Has this man disbelieved or not disbelieved? He has disbelieved. Has he associated partners with Allaah? That which is correct is that he has associated partners with Allaah. Every kaafir is a mushrik and every mushrik is a kaafir – there is no difference between the two words whatsoever.

Whoever disbelieves has associated partners with Allaah, and whoever associates partners with Allaah has disbelieved – there is nothing problematic in that. The evidence for this is if we remember the debate between the believer and the disbeliever in Surah al-Kahf: {And put forward to them the example of two men: We granted to one of them two gardens of grapes, and We surrounded both (gardens) with date-palms and placed between them crops. Each of the two gardens brought forth its produce and did not fail in the least therein, and We caused a river to gush forth in the midst of them. And he had property, so he said to his companion while debating with him: ‘I am greater than you in wealth and mightier in respect of men.’ And he went into his garden while unjust to himself (with disbelief)} – pay attention now – {And he went into his garden while unjust to himself (with disbelief). He said: ‘I do not think that this will ever perish and I do not think the Hour will come’}. According to your previous understanding, has this man disbelieved or associated partners with Allaah? According to your previous understanding, your wrong understanding, he has disbelieved but not associated partners with Allaah, he (just) denied the Resurrection. {He said: ‘I do not think that this will ever perish and I do not think the Hour will come. And if indeed I am brought back to my Lord, I will surely find better than this when I return to Him.’ His companion said to him while debating with him: ‘…If you see me less than you in wealth and children, may my Lord give me something better than your garden and send upon it a torment from the sky so it becomes a barren slippery earth, or its water becomes deep-sunken (into the earth) so you would never be able to get it.’ So his fruits/property were encompassed (with ruin), and he began clapping his hands (in regret) over what he had spent on it, while it was empty and fallen upon its trellises, and said: ‘Would that I had not associated any partners with my Lord!’}[1]

Therefore when he denied the Resurrection, he associated partners with Allaah. So whoever disbelieves in anything that has come in the Book or the Sunnah, he is a mushrik at the same time. This is with regard to the Qur.aanic text, so what is the intellect-related aspect? The answer is that He تعالى said: {Have you seen he who takes his own desire as his god?}[2] Hence whoever commits some type of disbelief is a mushrik because he made his own intellect a partner with his Lord تبارك وتعالى. For this reason, do not differentiate between kufr (disbelief) and shirk (associating partners with Allaah in that which is only for Him).

When you know this reality, there won’t be any problem which may sometimes occur to some of those who hear the Messenger’s ﷺ hadeeth with both its wordings: ‘whoever abandons the prayer has disbelieved’ and ‘whoever abandons the prayer has associated partners with Allaah.’[3] How is this? The one who differentiates between kufr and shirk will find the expression ‘associated partners with Allaah’ to be problematic; no that which is correct is to say that he has disbelieved.  Likewise the other hadeeth: ‘Whoever swears by other than Allaah has disbelieved’ and ‘whoever swears by other than Allaah has associated partners with Him.’[4] He has disbelieved, he has associated partners with Allaah. He has associated partners with Allaah, he has disbelieved. There is no difference between the two expressions in regard to Legislative terminology. In regard to linguistic terminology, there is a difference no doubt, but the Legislation illuminates our insight, thinking and understanding. Why is anyone who disbelieves in Allaah عز وجل – committing any type of disbelief – a mushrik? Because he makes his intellect a partner with his Lord عز وجل in those judgments and rulings that it passes.”

[1] Surat ul-Kahf 18:32-42
[2] Surat ul-Jaathiyah 45:23
[3] Saheeh at-Targheeb 568
[4] Saheeh at-Tirmithi 1535

[silsilat ul-hudaa wa nnoor 727/7 / alalbaany.com]

Every mushrik is a kaafir and every kaafir is a mushrik

Praying at graves

Q: “How do we reconcile between the Prophet’s ﷺ prohibition of praying in the graveyard and his praying over the grave of the woman who used to sweep the mosque?”

Shaikh al-Albaani:

“There is no contradiction between the two narrations, all praise is due to Allaah. The first narration with the prohibition of praying in the graveyard is like his ﷺ statement in Saheeh Muslim: ‘Don’t sit on graves and don’t pray towards them.’[1] So the prohibition of praying in the graveyard, i.e. of praying towards the graves, is because prayer must be sincerely for the Face of Allaah تبارك وتعالى without any glorification for other than Allaah mixed in it, as that is a type of shirk. So if a Muslim starts praying to Allaah while facing the grave, there would be a clear suspicion that this person at least intends -as many ignorant people do these days- to seek blessing from this deceased individual through his prayer and through his seeking nearness to Allaah عز وجل with his prayer. Thus he has fallen into some shirk which may get to such a point that it takes him out of the fold of Islaam, wal-`iyaadhu billaah (and refuge is sought in Allaah). This is the meaning that should be considered in regard to the Messenger’s ﷺ prohibition of praying in the graveyard or towards the grave.

As for praying over the deceased while he is in his grave, this is something else. It has nothing to do with praying to Allaah -alone, who has no partner- while facing the grave of the deceased, a prayer whose aim is not so Allaah forgives him, has mercy on him, as is the intent of supplicating over the deceased. Therefore, praying over the deceased while he is in his grave is one thing, and praying to Allaah عز وجل while facing the grave is another thing. The latter is what is prohibited and the former is what is permissible, so there is nothing problematic between the two.”

[1] Saheeh Muslim 972

[fataawaa jeddah 13 / alalbaany.com]

Praying at graves

The Creator of good & evil

The Prophet ﷺ said: “If you marry a woman or buy a slave, place your hand on her forehead, say ‘bismillaah’ and supplicate for blessing and say:

اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَسْأَلُكَ مِنْ خَيْرِهَا وَخَيْرِ مَا جَبَلْتَهَا عَلَيْهِ وَأَعُوذُ بِكَ مِنْ شَرِّهَا وَشَرِّ مَا جَبَلْتَهَا عَلَيْهِ
(O Allaah, indeed I ask You for the good in her and the good characteristics You have created in her, and I seek refuge in You from the evil in her and the evil characteristics You have created in her)

If you buy a camel, place your hand on top of its hump and say the same.”[1]

Shaikh al-Albaani:

“This narration has evidence that Allaah is the Creator of good and evil, contrary to those – such as the Mu`tazilah and others – who hold that evil is not from His creation تبارك وتعالى. There is nothing in Allaah’s being Creator of evil that contradicts His Perfection تعالى, rather it is part of His Perfection تبارك وتعالى. Details of that are present in comprehensive volumes, one of the best being the book Shifaaul-`Aleel fil-Qadhaa’i wal-Qadari wat-Ta`leel by Ibnul-Qayyim, so consult it if you wish.

Also, is this supplication legislated in the event of buying something like a car? My answer is: yes, due to the good that is hoped from it and the evil that is feared from it.”

[1] Saheeh Abu Daawood 2160 and others

[aadaabuz-zifaaf 92-93 / alalbaany.com]

The Creator of good & evil